Re: [DNA] DNA and TSLLAO

[JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>]

Dear Christian

> I think TSLLAO is very useful and should be standardized.

agree. 

> Further, IMO TSLLAO should be standardized as a stand-alone document.
> The reason is that TSLLAO can be useful even when the DNA protocol
> itself is not implemented.  "Situation A" and "Situation B" in
> draft-vogt-dna-relocation-00.txt are two examples.

agree. 

> Previous discussions on the IPv6 mailing list have shown that
> optimizations like TSLLAO are not the kind of thing for which the IPv6
> WG is the right place.  Folks have repeatedly refered to the DNA WG to
> handle such optimizations.  (See, e.g., the thread starting at [1].)

I prefer TSALLAO to be advanced in IPv6 WG. But in case IPv6 WG 
is reluctant, I wish DNA WG handles it instead. 

Thanks for your kind consideration. 

Best Regards

JinHyeock