Re: [DNA] [Issue X] LinkID v.s. Landmark Prefix

[JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>]

Brett

> I think you might have found one :)  

Thanks for your kind words. :-)

> Actually, there was some
> discussion recently on whether a NO answer should only include
> explcitly configured PIOs or should include a DNA option as well.
> You may have found a good reason to include the DNA option.
> 
> In this case the DNAO in the NO answer would include P1 which would
> allow the host to correctly recognise that there has been no change.

ok. Then NO answer would include PIOs and a DNA option. Right? 
Then the RA is a CompleteRA, isn't it? 

> > The above is not clear to me yet. Allow me a question to help
> > my understanding.
> >
> > Assume a host moves to a different link but fails to receive a
> > Link Up event Notification. Then the host will not assume a link
> > change even if it receives a different unsolicted CompleteRA?
> 
> As written, I don't think the draft ties the decision making to a link
> layer indication.  In the instance you brought up an incorrect decision
> would be made.  

ok. But I am still confused. Kindly clarify in which way hosts
would make a decision.  

Best Regards

JinHyeock