Re: [DNA] Re: LinkID v.s. Landmark Prefix

[JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>]

Greg 

> In None of the cases, is there an error unless there is
> reassignment of the prefix within the lifetime of the
> RA, and the timeout of information over an interval
> (?? don't know if it is 3 hours) has been previously
> described as a minor modification to both CompleteRA and
> Landmarks.
> 
> These were all assumed to apply the same technique.
> 
> So if we wait 3 hours, they are all equally robust
> (perfectly so).  This is the common case with all
> the examples presented thus far.

No, the above technique concerns only for "flash renumbering 
and early reassignment" but there were examples which were
not related to "flash renumbering and early reassignment".   

> What has been discussed recently on list was precisely
> the issue of operators reassigning prefixes without
> following recommendations.

The example I gave Erik has nothing to do with 
reassignment. 

I think you have a misconception. The synchronization issues 
raised so far don't concerns only "flash renubmering and early 
reassignment". They also deal with "flassping" or "Temporary 
lack of synchronization." 

Best Regards

JinHyeock