Re: [DNA] Proposed resolution to issue 9 fordraft-pentland-dna-protocol-01.txt

["Tero Kauppinen (JO/LMF)" <tero.kauppinen@ericsson.com>]

Hi Syam,

Syam Madanapalli wrote:
> Hi Brett,
> 
> The CPL requires to build complete prefix list on both the previous 
> link as well as on the new link. Is this correct?

Let's assume that the node has built a complete prefix for the old link. 
It then moves to a new link, and gets a "NO" answer. It's not required 
the node to receive all prefixes on the "new" link in order to detect 
that it's actually on the same link. The node can conclude this from a 
single joint prefix, or have I misunderstood the question?

Tero
> 
> Also Greg said the MN checks all RAs as they arrive. This means
> MN cannot make decision based on single RA with NO answer, unless
> the RA is a 'Complete RA'.
> 
> Also I am wondering how would CPL works without building complete
> prefix list on previous link? Are you assuming 'Complete RA'? 
> 
> I am sorry, I am getting confused.
> 
> -Syam