Re: [DNA] FMIPv6 and DNA

[Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>]

Hi Dirk,

Dirk Kutscher wrote:
> Greg Daley wrote:
> 
>> Dirk, do you have any other comments?
> 
> 
> Technically, it looks like what you want to do.
> 
> I am not quite sure about the intent of the document. Currently, it 
> seems to be intended for Informational, i.e., documenting how you could 
> use DNA as an optimization in certain FMIP scenarios. It could also be 
> interpreted as OPTIONAL MN behavior for FMIP, i.e., it could be updating 
> RFC4068.

Indeed.  Sometimes it's OK to have a separate small document though
rather than waiting for revisions to go back into a major document.

> Related to this, another question would be, whether this is actually an 
> item for DNA, because it describes DNA usage specifically for FMIP. 
> Maybe I am missing some context here, and this has already been 
> discussed...

There's still some discussion to undertake, since this could
equally be pointed at mipshop.  I'd guess though that we've
got the expertise in the group to handle the issue, especially
given the size of the document...

We can always do an additional/parallel last call in mipshop
(and I can ask the chairs if that's OK).

> Anyway, I think it should be published. The scenario is certainly relevant.

Thanks for your feedback.

Greg