[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] FMIPv6 and DNA

To: itijibox-dna@yahoo.com, Dirk Kutscher <dku@Informatik.Uni-Bremen.DE>, greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au
Subject: Re: [DNA] FMIPv6 and DNA
From: Syam Madanapalli <syam@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:56:10 +0530
Cc: dna@eng.monash.edu.au, "Rajeev.Koodli" <Rajeev.Koodli@nokia.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
References: <20050928055306.30533.qmail@web81908.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

Hi Gabriel,


>> <MIPSHOP Chair hat>
>
> Yes, we should do that, and until then it's ok for the document to "live" 
> in DNA.
>
> The only reason we'd rather move the work to MIPSHOP would be if the 
> document called for
> modifications to the base FMIPv6 spec (we're re-chartering to produce a 
> revision,
> FMIPv6-bis). But I don't believe this doc calls for any modifications to 
> the base
> FMIPv6 specification, right? It only seems to have recommendations on how 
> FMIPv6
> would operate in the presence of DNAv6. Confirmation would be good. 
> Rajeev?

Yes, this document in does not call for any modifications to the
FMIPv6 RFC.

>
> </MIPSHOP Chair hat>
>
> -gabriel
>
>

References:
- Re: [DNA] FMIPv6 and DNA
  - From: gabriel montenegro <itijibox-dna@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] FMIPv6 and DNA
Next by Date: [DNA] Prefix information for link identification in DNA
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] FMIPv6 and DNA
Next by thread: [DNA] Simplification of DNAv4 specification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread