[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DNA] Updates to dna-protocol3
Before submitting the draft to become draft-ietf-dna-protocol-00.txt I
have some updates to reflect the feedback that we've had so far. The
update can be viewed at:
http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/dna-dt/draft-ietf-dna-protocol-pre00.txt
And a diff from protocol3 can be seen at:
http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/dna-dt/draft-ietf-dna-protocol-pre00-from-draft-pentland-dna-protocol3-00.diff.html
Does anyone have any objections to the amendments made so far? Do they
break anything? Positive ACKs are ok too. :)
There's a few issues that have come up while making the edits. They
don't necessarily have to be resolved before submission of the -00, but
some input would be useful.
- Should the explicit linkid always be in the LPO or can it be a flag in
a PIO (the latter is in the draft)?
- What order do the hosts treat the indications (land mark option,
prefixes, linkid in the draft at present)
- Given that we now have an explicit linkid, should we get rid of all of
the flags in the landmark option - the no flag is not really needed
and since taking that out would leave only one, we can probably get
rid of that as well - LO in RA = yes (at present the flags are still
there)
Regards,
Brett.