Re: [DNA] Updates to dna-protocol3

[Greg Daley <Greg.Daley@eng.monash.edu.au>]

Hi Brett,


----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Daley <Greg.Daley@eng.monash.edu.au>
Date: Saturday, March 18, 2006 3:11 am
Subject: Re: [DNA] Updates to dna-protocol3
To: Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>
Cc: Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>, Dna
<dna@eng.monash.edu.au>

> Hi Brett.
> 
> >    If a unicast response is not possible but there is a multicast RA
> >    already scheduled for transmission in the next 
> > MulticastRADelay, then
> >    the Router Solicitation MUST be dropped.
> 
> What do you mean must be dropped?  How about saying
> 
> "... then no additional Router Advertisement is generated in response
> to the Router Solicitation."
> 

Actually, how about saying?

"... then the Router Solicitation MUST be silently discarded."

I think that's what you were getting at?

Greg