Re: [DNA] CONSENSUS CALL : Document merges

[Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>]

Though it's more work, I think option B will make it easier for 
developers to find what they need.

Brett.

Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>    At the last meeting in Dallas lot of concerns were raised about the
> number of documents being produced by the WG. The Consensus was to
> reduce the number of documents to keep related information together.
>    The chairs have identified two possible merger scenarios and would
> like to know the opinion of the working group regarding these two.
> 
> 
> Option A:
> =========
> Combine
> 1) Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6 Networks (DNAv6)
> and
> 2) Tentative Options for Link-Layer Addresses in IPv6 Neighbour Discovery
> (draft-ietf-dna-protocol-00 + draft-ietf-dna-tentative-00)
> 
> into one document.
> 
> Merge
> 3) Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6 - Best Current Practices for hosts
> and
> 4) DNA with unmodified routers: Prefix list based approach
> (draft-ietf-dna-hosts-03 + draft-ietf-dna-cpl-02)
> 
> into another document.
> 
> Option B:
> =========
> 
> Merge all the above mentioned documents
> 
> * draft-ietf-dna-protocol-00
> * draft-ietf-dna-tentative-00
> * draft-ietf-dna-hosts-03
> * draft-ietf-dna-cpl-02
> 
> into a single document.
> 
> This consensus call will last for two weeks and will end on the 29th of
> June 2006. Please respond to the list whether you
> 
> * Prefer Option A
> * Prefer Option B
> 
> If you do not have a preference and you are ok with either option,
> please respond with "Don't care ". If we have consensus on the Don't
> cares the chairs will make the decision.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh and Greg