RE: [DNA] CONSENSUS CALL : Document merges

[Mohan.Parthasarathy@nokia.com]

Greg already asked this question once before and i said
my preference is option A. 

-mohan
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au 
>[mailto:owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au] On Behalf Of 
>ext Sathya Narayanan
>Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:04 PM
>To: suresh.krishnan@ericsson.ca
>Cc: Dna; Suresh Krishnan (QB/EMC); Greg Daley; Jari Arkko
>Subject: Re: [DNA] CONSENSUS CALL : Document merges
>
>I prefer option A.
>
>As I mentioned earlier, I think option A is the more practical option.
>
>thanks,
>Sathya
>
>Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>    At the last meeting in Dallas lot of concerns were raised 
>about the 
>> number of documents being produced by the WG. The Consensus was to 
>> reduce the number of documents to keep related information together.
>>    The chairs have identified two possible merger scenarios 
>and would 
>> like to know the opinion of the working group regarding these two.
>>
>>
>> Option A:
>> =========
>> Combine
>> 1) Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6 Networks (DNAv6) and
>> 2) Tentative Options for Link-Layer Addresses in IPv6 Neighbour 
>> Discovery (draft-ietf-dna-protocol-00 + draft-ietf-dna-tentative-00)
>>
>> into one document.
>>
>> Merge
>> 3) Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6 - Best Current Practices for 
>> hosts and
>> 4) DNA with unmodified routers: Prefix list based approach
>> (draft-ietf-dna-hosts-03 + draft-ietf-dna-cpl-02)
>>
>> into another document.
>>
>> Option B:
>> =========
>>
>> Merge all the above mentioned documents
>>
>> * draft-ietf-dna-protocol-00
>> * draft-ietf-dna-tentative-00
>> * draft-ietf-dna-hosts-03
>> * draft-ietf-dna-cpl-02
>>
>> into a single document.
>>
>> This consensus call will last for two weeks and will end on the 29th 
>> of June 2006. Please respond to the list whether you
>>
>> * Prefer Option A
>> * Prefer Option B
>>
>> If you do not have a preference and you are ok with either option, 
>> please respond with "Don't care ". If we have consensus on the Don't 
>> cares the chairs will make the decision.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Suresh and Greg
>
>
>