[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] Issue 5: MaxCacheTime - do we want to keep thisfunctionality?

To: Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Issue 5: MaxCacheTime - do we want to keep thisfunctionality?
From: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:09:46 +0900
Cc: Dna <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;b=ZSDckM43T7pjwLD4efqce0IK6DNvLoW1Kq6e+akcIltSix7uYbfS28RXbhpcYhysg+wh4yKI8u0pkYMslNmN88adzynICNHxfrqeDLCBxjIDBjLkIRpQ4lzSV/8aMokMe2ADJ6IytWNMCjIXb/UWbeJS1rg12bjPvUsjZnhHRso=
In-reply-to: <45537932.6030907@Research.Panasonic.COM>
References: <45537932.6030907@Research.Panasonic.COM>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

> Issue 4, was about DNA terminology - I will take care of it.
>
> Issue: There is text about using prior information for detecting link
> change in the text. Do we want to keep something like that?
>
> Agreement at the meeting: No. Lets remove the text.

agree.

JinHyeock

References:
- [DNA] Issue 5: MaxCacheTime - do we want to keep this functionality?
  - From: Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] Issue 7: Removing some sections
Next by Date: Re: [DNA] Issue 3: Do we need landmark Y/N bit?
Prev by thread: [DNA] Issue 5: MaxCacheTime - do we want to keep this functionality?
Next by thread: [DNA] Issue 6: DNAHostLinkIDList
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread