[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [DNA] DNAv6 Review from Mobopts



> It may cause some problem for DNA scheme to rely on MAC address as below.
>
> First, in certain technology such as 802.16, MAC address is not used
> for data transfer. In some implementation, when a host performs
> address resolution to find the router's MAC address, its device driver
> intercepts the message and provides a bogus MAC address.
 
So the device driver is spoofing a response to the Neighbor Solicitation? 
Won't this cause problems if and when SEND is implemented?

> Moreover, when a host moves to another subnet/ link, it won't speed up
> DNA procedure to check whether its existing default router is still
> reachable. So the scheme will give little help when, IMO, fast DNA is
> needed the most, i.e. when a host doesn't have a valid address, so
> should get a new one ASAP.
 
Since ND and RS/RA are done simultaneously in simple DNAv6, the completion
time is determined by the faster of the two exchanges.  In the case where the
host doesn't have a valid address, the ND exchanges will fail (no response),
and the host will obtain an address via the normal RS/RA procedure.